One of the UK’s most eminent cardiologists, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, wrote a two-part research paper, Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine.” What makes this all the more remarkable is he was one of the first people to take two doses of the vaccine and promote it on @Good Morning Britain.
He has changed his mind, and it’s tragically the result of his father’s death. His father was vaccinated just before he went into cardiac arrest and died. That led his son to go down the path of discovery.
What he found stunned him. He now blames the government for his father’s death.
Dr. Malhotra’s research was published in The Journal of Insulin Resistance. We will post the conclusions for you, and you can read the study on the link below to see how he came up with his conclusions.
Research Results, Part 1
Results: In the non-elderly population the “number needed to treat” to prevent a single death runs into the thousands. Re-analysis of randomised controlled trials using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology suggests a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalised from COVID-19s.
Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety. Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021, with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16–39-year-old age group.
Conclusion: It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.
Research Results, Part II
Results: Underlying causes for this failure include regulatory capture – guardians that are supposed to protect the public are in fact funded by the corporations that stand to gain from the sale of those medications. A failure of public health messaging has also resulted in wanton waste of resources and a missed opportunity to help individuals lead healthier lives with relatively simple – and low cost – lifestyle changes.
Conclusion: A failure of public health messaging has also resulted in wanton waste of resources and a missed opportunity to help individuals lead healthier lives through relatively simple, low-cost lifestyle changes. In conclusion of both papers, there is a strong scientific, ethical, and moral case to be made that COVID-19 vaccines rollout must stop immediately until raw data has been released for fully independent scrutiny. Looking to the future, the medical and public health professions must recognize these failings and eschew the tainted dollar of the medical industrial complex. It will take a lot of time and effort to restore trust in these institutions, but the future and the health of both the medical profession and humanity depend on it. To read both papers, which are free and open access, please visit insulinresistance.org.
His Interview With GB News on his research
Facebook deemed this partly false. FB is censorship hell. GB News might have appealed since the warning had been removed. FB learned nothing from censoring the truth about the vaccines.
“When the vaccines were first released, we were told they were 95% effective against infection.
It wasn’t true. Only one in 119 people were protected from infection.
This statistic was the guise under which vaccine mandates were implemented.
“The latest data reveals that once infected; there is no significant difference in transmission rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, which makes any scientific case for mandates illegitimate.
“As newer and thankfully, less lethal, mutated strains became dominant, any protection against infection at the very least became less effective and likely completely ineffective, even if there is some significant protection against serious illness and death.”
‘The overall net effect of the drug industry on society has been a negative one in the last few decades.’
Dr Aseem Malhotra criticises the ‘increase in deregulation’ of the drug industry.
📺 Freeview 236, Sky 515, Virgin 626
💻 GB News YouTube: https://t.co/Wa58gYYAod pic.twitter.com/Cifws5EUoA
— GB News (@GBNEWS) June 30, 2022
Clear, measured and eminently readable. Everyone will benefit from taking the time to read this paper… https://t.co/y1Smc9s3mG
— Brownie McGhee (@McgheeBrownie) September 26, 2022
Malhotra cannot have been eminent since he was unaware of the problems with the fake vaccine. We knew it before it was released. It is mRNA gene therapy, inadequately tested and with a secret composition. The manufacturers never stated it would prevent infection and transmission. The inventor of that technology said it was harmful as he openly mocked Fauci. Malhotra is a fool.
Malhotra is also ignorant of the government-pharma partnership dangers. He instead whines about deregulation. That is overtly dishonest. Government funded pharma with billions to do whatever it wished, as industry lobbyists in government positions approved the jabs. Government also funded mass advertising, overt and covert, in the media to promote jabbings. This fool Malhotra pretends as if industry went out of control because the government had less power over it. Government was actively involved in the scandal. He has to be corrupt to say such foolish things.
Some very personal thoughts. I hope no one is offended.
I am just a humble small town preacher with a small flock. In the eyes of most people I am a nothing.
I refused the mRNA vaccine despite the urging, well l more actually pressure, from my beloved personal physician to get “shot up” (your know, like Russian roulette with five bullets instead of one in a six shot revolver).
The thing that first caught my attention was the knowledge that fetal cells from murdered children (the euphemism they use is abortion, or even worse, the removal of the products of conception) were used in a lot of medical research and I suspected genetic tampering. All the major producers of mRNA vaccines used those cells.
The second thing was with a BS in Zoology (lacking only 2 cases to have it in Cell physiology) I was aware of a lot of genetic studies and of DNA and mRNA. My ‘Spidey sense’ set off alarms that DNA could be damaged or changed in a bad way.
Because I was indirectly under a mandate and others close to me could not work with being vaccinated, research led me to a non-mRNA vaccine that met the mandate of being vaccinated.
Meanwhile reports like the Canadian doctor who found “micro-clots” by accident begin to raise other alarms bells. I have a bad history of DVT’s.
Now to thanks to people like M. Dowling the whole ugly situation is being revealed by what is left of an honest press.
It seems slowly people are awakening to the dangers of what are effectively totalitarian regimes (e.g. Biden, and most of the Democrat state governors).
Ironically Putin’s use of natural gas supplies as an instrument of war are also waking the world up (slowly!) to the foolishness of the madness of the (Global warming – now rebranded climate change) mob. Britain is now considering opening more exploration and production of oil and natural gas.
The only question is will realization and correction come before everything is effectively flushed down the sewer?
Sincerely,
One who is just trying to live a simple moral life while upholding truth.
PS Did you ever notice how the left continually to change their terminology as the current terminology is proved to be non-factual? Murder is called something like women’s right, or a cycle of the sun that was actually slightly cooling the earth is no longer called global warming but climate change while the philosophy goes unchanged
At least you gave it some independent thought. I think the non-mRNA jab also has spike proteins in it, which still delivers some of the dangers.
Since your doctor was as wrong as this Malhotra failure, is your doctor still beloved?
In this covid hoax, I know of 2 significant changes in terminology:
(1) a non-vaccine is referred to as a vaccine (mRNA)
(2) A non-case is referred to as a case. The known improper PCR test generates many false positives. A false positive without symptoms was never caused a case before.