Roger Stone’s trial begins with a jury pool not of his peers


In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ~ Sixth Amendment

Republican operative and television personality, author, and radio host, Roger Stone is fighting federal charges in a courtroom trial that began Monday. The jury pool will come from an electorate who despises his friend and boss, President Trump.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson, Roger Stone

The U.S. District Court in Washington chooses jury pools strictly from deepest-blue D.C. boundaries, otherwise known to many as the “swamp.”

The Constitution’s Sixth Amendment mandates an “impartial jury” of one’s peers. His 12 jurors will probably not be a jury of Mr. Stone’s peers.

Mr. Stone, 67, is a longtime conservative Republican is openly committed to Mr. Trump. He has accused special counsel Robert Mueller of trying to turn potential jurors against him.


“At the beginning of jury selection, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee who took a hard stand against Paul Manafort, said that she would not remove potential jurors solely on the basis that they work for the federal government or because of their views of Trump,” the Daily Caller reported.

Judge Jackson rejected a request from defense lawyers Tuesday to remove a potential juror who dislikes President Trump and whose husband is a lawyer who worked on the Russia-Trump case.

Politico reported, “And that first juror was an only-in-Washington character, a former Obama-era press secretary for the Office of Management and Budget whose husband still works at the Justice Department division that played a role in the Russia probe that ultimately snagged Stone. She acknowledged having negative views of President Donald Trump and said she had followed the media coverage of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.”

The outlet noted that the woman said she did not have strong views about Stone and could make a fair judgment.

Jackson denied a request from Stone’s lawyers to strike the woman as a potential juror.

“A former attorney who stepped up to be questioned to sit on the jury admitted he was “deeply opposed to everything Donald Trump stands for,” and had voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016,” Courthouse News reported.

But the prospective juror said despite the “highly charged political climate” in Washington, he had no doubt he could set aside his personal political opinions to serve on the jury, according to the same outlet.

Jackson would not send the juror home.

After that, Stone became ill and left the courtroom with food poisoning. He and his wife went gone to the courthouse clinic.


One male potential juror unknowingly used Stone’s own words to describe the defendant, calling him a “dirty trickster.” He said he knew Stone had a tattoo of Richard Nixon on his back, and that the former president was known as “Tricky Dick,” according to courthouse news.

Another man described Stone as a “political provocateur,” while a woman from the witness box said Stone is “clearly a flamboyant character.”

The pool of fifty jurors has been whittled down to 34.

Do you think he can get a fair trial and is this a jury of his peers?

The judge placed a gag order on the trial so Americans won’t know what Roger Stone’s thinking.


While he was investigated for alleged contacts with Wikileaks, he was “not charged with hacking or handling of emails, and there is no evidence in the special counsel’s report that he did,” Daily Caller reported.

The Daily Caller reported further, “Instead, Stone is accused of lying during his House Intelligence Committee testimony in September 2017 regarding his discussions with Trump campaign officials and other associates regarding WikiLeaks’ plans to release Democrats’ emails.”

“He has pleaded not guilty to lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his communications with WikiLeaks. He also pleaded not guilty to charges of obstruction of justice and witness tampering,” according to the outlet.

Roger Stone left the courtroom sweating and pale as the court recessed. He faces life in prison.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

Sounds like grounds for an appeal after the inevitable conviction.

2 years ago

He should have his attorney ask for a continuance until the General Flynn trial is resolved so that he may benefit from any information revealed in that trial. If he could get LIFE for being a high level bullsh*tter, how many life sentences are the REAL crooks going to get? He should also check with Ms. Powell to see if she would take his case. And he should go ahead and file for a mistrial based on the Judges remarks and attitude AND her obvious bias!

Lisa Hawks
Lisa Hawks
2 years ago

great, this judge needs to be removed…most of those jurors don’t like Trump and she is letting them remain…THEY ARE BIASED and SHOULD NOT be allowed on the jury…what kind of horseshit is this?

Mark Matis
Mark Matis
2 years ago

This is the “Legal” system in action. Remember than when the festivities begin.

Richard Frey
Richard Frey
2 years ago

If Stone couldn’t get the Case moved to another Jurisdiction……He’s “Screwed”…….. the make up of Obama hired Government workers is not an Impartial” Jury Pool and should be ruled “Unconstitutional” By the Supreme Court !!!!!!

2 years ago
Reply to  Richard Frey

That judge should be removed from the bench