This is what went wrong with the Windham ballots – it’s the machine

5
764

Republicans in Windham, New Hampshire, won all four seats in the legislative election on Nov. 3. A Democrat, who thought she only lost by 24 voters, Kristi St. Lauren, asked for a recount.

The recount showed she lost by a lot more and that led to an audit. It seems the folds and the machine caused the problem.

“We now have experimental confirmation that if the contest is undervoted, a fold through a vote target can create a vote. None of the 65 ballots was marked for St. Laurent, but the machines interpreted 25 of the folds as votes for her,” wrote the Twitter account, WindhamNHAuditors, which is operated by auditors Harri Hursti, Mark Lindeman, and Phillip Stark. It later clarified that it was 75 votes, not 65 votes.

In other words, the scanner machine thought the folds were valid votes for her.

“Something we strongly suspect at this juncture, based on various evidence, is that in some cases, fold lines are being interpreted by the scanners as valid votes,” one of the auditors, told WMUR-TV.

The auditors, in another tweet, found that another machine had an “even more dramatic problem” and counted only 28 percent of the 75 votes for each Republican candidate in the contest.

“Because if someone voted for all four Republican candidates and the ballot happened to have its fold line going through St. Laurent’s target, then that might be interpreted by the machines as an overvote, which would then subtract votes from each of those four Republican candidates,” Stark, an auditor, told the station.

“Conversely, if there were not four votes already in that contest by the voter, a fold line through that target could have caused the machine to interpret it as a vote for St. Laurent.”

AccuVote is the company responsible. Maybe they should change their name to Inaccuvote.


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Prisoner
The Prisoner
3 years ago

What incredible incompetence, to design or use machines which cannot distinguish a fold from a vote. There are things called testing and certification. America is now an incompetent nation.

NHConstitutionalist
NHConstitutionalist
3 years ago

We live 2 towns over from Windham NH in a smaller town with 1800 voters. I’m now wondering if other towns and municipalities also had the same situation with folded ballots, as well as across this country, but the votes were not contested. so we don’t know. And how much of a problem this may have caused in the presidential, senatorial and congressional elections.
There were millions of mail-in ballots that had to be folded that were sent .How much of an impact on erroneous vote counts were made because of those folded ballots?

Mutant Ryeff
Mutant Ryeff
3 years ago

No more machines to count votes.

Of Mice and Men
Of Mice and Men
3 years ago

Huge plans of world conquest, folds on a ballot.
Don’t worry the faculty lounge heroes haven’t even got the cosmic bag of wrenches in the works but it is warming up.

Greg
Greg
3 years ago

Maybe it’s AccruVotes.