White House Thought China Might Stand with Them, Well, They Got Their Answer

7
309

A number of White House officials wondered if China would back off supporting Russia and sanction them over the invasion of Ukraine. The media also seemed to think that was a possibility. It’s a mystery as to why they came to that opinion.

Well, it’s not happening. China said yesterday that NATO should disband and the US is to blame for Russia invading Ukraine.

THE DUMMIES IN THE WHITE HOUSE

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said on March 21st that a “verbal condemnation” of Russia by China is “vital” amid Russian President Vladimir Putin’s continuing war in Ukraine.

Psaki told reporters during the White House’s daily press conference that Chinese President Xi Jinping needed to verbally condemn Russia’s invasion. The China ambassador to the US had said condemnation alone wouldn’t do a thing.

“Our view is that verbal condemnation of the actions of President Putin and the actions of [the] Russian military is important and vital, and it’s about what side of history you want to stand on in this point in time,” Psaki said.

Both the US and the UK were battling to get both China and India to side with NATO as if that could possibly happen. They tried bullying them.

The media said China wasn’t showing its cards and NPR, in particular, said China “seemed” to side with Russia.

The naivèté is stunning. Why would China side with the West?

CHINA WANTS NATO DISSOLVED

China believes NATO should have been dissolved after the USSR, which it was created to contain, no longer existed, the Foreign Ministry stated on Friday.

Ah, but we still have China, Iran, and North Korea, so no, we’ll keep NATO.

THE CCP BLAMES THE US FOR THE INVASION

Spokesman Zhao Lijian lamented the fact that…the US-led military bloc expanded and cornered Russia, eventually triggering the present bloodshed in Ukraine.

“As a product of the Cold War, NATO should have become history when the Soviet Union disintegrated,” he said during a daily press conference on Friday when asked about remarks on NATO’s role as a US geopolitical tool made by his Russian counterpart, Maria Zakharova.

Zhao said that NATO expanded eastwards in Europe for decades, in violation of promises made to the Soviet leadership. This pushed Russia “into a corner step by step,” so ultimately, NATO was “the initiator and biggest promoter of the Ukraine crisis” on behalf of the US, he stated, adding that the organization should reflect on what exactly it contributes to European security.

Moscow didn’t want Ukraine to join NATO, which is one of the reasons given for the invasion.

There you have it. Chinese communist dictators are on the side of the dictators of Russia. Why would anyone think anything different?


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Get Some Froggy
Guest
Get Some Froggy
1 year ago

I’ll stomp a mudhole in your ass and walk it good and dry.

Some Text On A Screen
Guest
Some Text On A Screen
1 year ago

@ Adonna,

Google medical degree not acknowledged, work on it.

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
1 year ago

It’s interesting that Traitor Joe and the Democrats, who are owned by China, would think China is on their side. The Democrats have gone insane over Green Energy and Electric Vehicles. The big winner would be China and not America. China controls most of the rare Earth materials needed for the Modern EV. Afghanistan had some serious reserves, but Traitor Joe pretty much gave them to China. China has us by the balls at the moment and it’s all Democrat Ideology induced.

To move to EVs by 2030, America would have to double it’s Electrical Generation capacity to replace the energy used by Petroleum to fuel transportation in America. That would require building 1,000 Average Size Nuclear Power Plants (Green Energy) in just 7 years. This is possible, but the cost would be around 20 Trillion or 15% of Americas GDP per year. Along with that, the Grid will also need to be doubled. That is a lot more questionable and the cost is unknown. A more realistic move to EVs is over 50 years. That is how long it took to move from Horse and Buggies to Automobiles in America. If we push industry to expand the electrical grid, a thirty year horizon is practical without serious disruption to the economy and people’s standard of living. It would also go a long way to expanding America’s automated manufacturing capability. Democrats are acting like spoiled children singularly focused on the EV issue.

The real holy grail of energy is Nuclear Fission and America should be working towards that instead of solar panels and windmills which are unreliable. Living in the Pine Belt, a good old fashion Steam Plant to generate electricity would be more reliable and sustainable than Solar and Wind. Oh! A Steam Plant would also be EMP resistant and likely to survive Nuclear War! When I run the numbers, a Steam Plant would also be cheaper – almost half the cost! Wood is so abundant here that it is almost a nuisance. With proper maintenance it would last much longer than solar panels.

Win One For the Gipper
Guest
Win One For the Gipper
1 year ago

Watched that Mr. Reagan Jank Uyghur and Young Turks funding the fraudulent Justice Democrats acting troop with the squad and other Z grade posers acting as members of the congress brothel with their stated intention of taking over the government from within.
I love it when commies eat their own!

Adonis
Guest
Adonis
1 year ago

Why is anyone surprised? Only woke incompetent illegitimate administration would be, obviously.