Newsom’s New Law: Many Can Sue Elon Musk Over Parody

6
133

Gavin Newsom signed a vague law that hurts the First Amendment and democracy. It bans political parodies and likely memes. He did this over a parody he didn’t like. As a result, he wants anyone who says they were offended or says it’s untrue to sue Elon Musk and the parody’s author. If that happens, who will put up a parody? Who can afford lawsuits? The law is aimed at politicians and limits people’s ability to criticize leaders with humor.

Newsom also won’t rule out suing Elon Musk.

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s tyrannical response to a reporter’s question about the law:

I think Mr. Musk has missed the punch line. Parody is still alive and well in California, but deep fakes and manipulation of elections, that hurts democracy and the integrity of the system and trust. And we believe in truth and trust, and we think this law is sound and will be upheld in the courts.

Reporter: So, do you intend to seek legal action, whether around Elon Musk or any of the proliferating the…?

Well, uh, the law asserts that many can seek injunction relief, and I just signed the law and just signed 32 other bills on housing, and I haven’t had a chance to review this specific lawsuit around a conservator, conservative blogger that seems offended by it.”

The Constitution is clear on this issue.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You can’t infringe, PERIOD.

Parody, memes, criticism, hate speech, argumentative language, discourse against politicians and public officials ( elected or installed ), mean words.. etc, are all protected rights, not privileges, under the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Read the law. It’s banning a lot of speech 60 days before an election and empowers people to sue with their leftist lawyers.

Newsom is attempting to redefine the First Amendment.

Ab 2655 Berman Analysis by MaurA 


You can comment on the article after the ads and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ThinkAboutIt
ThinkAboutIt
8 months ago

Counting down for the Supreme Court to cancel this unconstitutional law before the first arrest. This is legal kryptonite. No judge wants this on their record.

Anonymous
Anonymous
8 months ago

Who would have guessed California would be the first to secede from the union. They tore up the constitution and King Gavin is in charge.

Dr. Van Nostrand
Dr. Van Nostrand
8 months ago

He must have gotten that from England where free speech doesn’t exist. Don’t think that will stand up to court challenges.

Anonymous
Anonymous
8 months ago

Why are you worried? You ban people here, so do you think that you will not be banned? I warned alex jones when He got ban happy and look at what happened. He got Banned. You do not want peoples thoughts so stop asking. Most of you are way too immature and easily offended. You cannot even handle a little… Read more »

Anonymous
Anonymous
8 months ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Hey retard, you can post anonymously here. There are no accounts to get banned. Grow up idiot.

Canadian Friend
Canadian Friend
8 months ago

That is what dictators do. I don t remember the details but about 30 years ago Fidel Castro had thrown a poet and a couple journalists in prison because he did not like what they were writing about him. It is also like that in North Korea, criticizing or making fun of ” dear leader” is not allowed. Newsom and… Read more »