Here’s another Motive to Blow Up the Russian Pipeline

10
2438

Russia blew up its own pipeline to help the West out. They’re OK!

Here is another situation where the Nordstream bombing benefits the West, not Russia. Granholm is useless as Energy Secretary. The only thing she knows is wind and solar energy, which makes us reliant on China for parts.

Granholm says. “No country wants to take the risk of putting a significant amount of its energy demand to Russia … & in fact, this accelerates the EU’s push to become energy independent through clean energy & … their own homegrown energy.”

Could it be tough love?

She is saying that blowing up the pipeline motivated the West to move even faster toward solar and wind [which will make us rely on China instead of Russia].

Democrats want us to rely 100% on China for our energy.

IT’S NOT JUST GRANHOLM, BLINKEN’S BOASTING OF IT AS AN OPPORTUNITY

Secretary of State Antony Blinken told reporters on Friday that the sabotage of the Nord Stream gas pipelines is a “tremendous opportunity” to wean EU states off Russian energy.

With winter approaching, Blinken said that the US wants the bloc to use less fuel.

Washington has been trying to convince EU leaders to swap Russian gas for its LNG for years.

The severity of the damage to the undersea conduits now means that the bloc is “indefinitely deprived” of Russian gas via this route, Russian energy operator Gazprom stated on Friday.

Speaking to reporters in Washington, Blinken boasted that the US is now “the leading supplier of [liquefied natural gas] to Europe.” In addition to shipping its own fuel to Europe, Blinken said that the US is working with European leaders to find ways to “decrease demand” and “speed up the transition to renewables.”

“It’s a tremendous opportunity to once and for all remove the dependence on Russian energy and thus to take away from [Russian President] Vladimir Putin the weaponization of energy as a means of advancing his imperial designs,” Blinken declared.

That’s not suspicious at all.

Did the US pay one of the allies to do it – Poland? Ukraine? Did the US do it? The West says Russia did it! Who has the motive?


PowerInbox
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter York
Guest
Peter York
1 year ago

five bucks says it was rigged pigs running through the interior of the pipes.

Peter B. Prange
Guest
Peter B. Prange
1 year ago

wow!!! Great article and great comment.
“Follow the money”, who benefits? Certainly not Russia! they lose both money and leverage!

Catapult
Guest
Catapult
1 year ago

Despite Traitor Joe’s craving for a war – any war, foreign, civil, nuclear – and his public threat to destroy the Nord Stream pipeline, it is Klaus Schwab’s WEF that has the most to gain from the Nord Stream gas line sabotage.

1.    A key part of the WEF Great Reset is to destroy Europe’s energy grid.  Mission accomplished.

2.    The global warming hoax has been central to the WEF fearmongering propaganda barrage. Since there has been no appreciable rise in global average temperature for the last 20 years, the AGW lie has failed to gain traction. But by releasing a greenhouse gas far more potent than the <2% CO2 content in our atmosphere, namely methane, perhaps there is hope that now the apocalyptic global warming predictions move closer to reality. Huge quantities of methane just might produce the climate change that have so far failed to materialize.

GuvGeek
Guest
GuvGeek
1 year ago
Reply to  Catapult

The amount of gasses released are nothing compared to a major volcano.

Mack Bolan
Guest
Mack Bolan
1 year ago

Let’s make the ignorant left eat their own dog food. Force CA to go 100% wind and solar – in six months cut off ALL other sources of energy (including fuels). Then watch the collapse into a 3rd world country like, say, Somalia.

Bruce_in_AZ
Guest
Bruce_in_AZ
1 year ago

How are we going to be energy independent. They stole the language. Solar and wind will not make us independent of anything. If we had an intelligent administration (big “if”) we would be developing the natural gas and building LNG depots to supply Europe as well as our own needs.