Obamala Is Open to Destroying the Electoral College

21
2645

In March 2019, Kamala Harris, who was dubbed the “female Obama,” said she was open to discussing eliminating the Electoral College. She didn’t seem to understand it’s constitutionally mandated so a handful of heavily populated states don’t get to decide the president. It would silence smaller states.

“I’m open to the discussion,” Harris said in an appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live. “There’s no question that the popular vote has been diminished in terms of making the final decision about who’s the president of the United States, and we need to deal with that, so I’m open to the discussion.”

It would take a constitutional amendment.

States that have winner-takes-all within the state, like New York and California, deprive millions of votes. In the last gubernatorial election, Long Island, Upstate, and Staten Island voted for Lee Zeldin, but Manhattan got to decide because of the millions who lived there. Many people live there illegally.

If we do that for the country, California and New York get to decide every presidential election.

She is dangerous.


You can comment on the article after the ads (please be polite to commenters), and subscribe to the Daily Newsletter here if you would like a quick view of the articles of the day and any late news:

PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
aClue
aClue
11 months ago

These people are STUPID.

There’s no question that the popular vote has been diminished in terms of making the final decision about who’s the president of the United States”

Uh, the Electoral college seats the fed gov president period. The popular vote doesn’t.

aClue
aClue
11 months ago
Reply to  aClue

And this is why shes mocked as a DIE hire. If she KNEW these things and did the duty of the office, then we couldn’t call her a DIE HIRE. But since shes just a clown occupying a position to do the opposite of its duties, we can call her whatever, just like Butt gig.

Dana
Dana
11 months ago

Free American Citizens, LIKE our Constitution.
Too many communists have tried to cancel it over the centuries and too many good men and women have died to protect it; for any US traitor(s) to try to cancel it.
We WILL, fight all enemies, and punish those who survive, who try to cancel it.

Phenry
Phenry
11 months ago

Kamala Harris’s real problem is she is an anchor baby who had foreign parents at birth, she received her citizenship through a reinterpretation of the 14th amendment, in other words, she is a naturalized citizen, and did NOT receive her citizenship naturally… she is not eligible for either top office. The Constitution Does Not Allow Children Born Of Non-Citizens To… Read more »

Eyes of Horus
Eyes of Horus
11 months ago

What makes those opposing the Electoral College think that the popular vote will always be in their favor? Oh, yes, it’ll always be a rigged election that’ll keep the same slime balls in office.

aClue
aClue
11 months ago
Reply to  Eyes of Horus

Is there a reason they can’t do the same thing with the electors at the electoral college? why not keep a backup? huh.

tomhoser
tomhoser
11 months ago

The only reason we have the United States in its current form is because of the adoption of the electoral collage. Small population agrarian states realized that without it, they would never have a voice in federal government, as the more populated industrial states would always have the final say. Yes, it’s a concept that takes a little research (Federal… Read more »

Michael Day
Michael Day
11 months ago

A REPUBLIC IF YOU CAN KEEP IT

Plato v2.0
Plato v2.0
11 months ago
Reply to  Michael Day

According to Biden just two weeks ago it was a “Coalition if we could keep it.”
You know like the “thing” in the preamble of the Declaration of Independence.

aClue
aClue
11 months ago
Reply to  Michael Day

Awww.. The tree of liberty just needs some watering is all… 🙂

kat
kat
11 months ago

Now, maybe people can see the danger in the Convention of States. They aim to do away with electors in their current form, and further change our founding documents, last I looked. The Constitution needs READING not changing!

Anonymous
Anonymous
11 months ago
Reply to  kat

The Convention of states CANNOT DO ANY SUCH THING!!!!!!!

kat
kat
11 months ago
Reply to  Anonymous

lol…pandora’s box is a concept you need to be familiar with.

Anonymous
Anonymous
11 months ago
Reply to  kat

Facts are something YOU need to get familiar with

Plato v2.0
Plato v2.0
11 months ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Read Article V of the Constitution you absolute MORON!!!!

Anonymous
Anonymous
11 months ago
Reply to  Plato v2.0

YOU read it!

TheTexasCooke
TheTexasCooke
11 months ago
Reply to  kat

Actually, the Convention can only propose amendments. Those amendments require the ratification of 38 State Legislatures to be adopted. AND…she’s too stooped to realize it’ll take more than an EO to do that.

Plato v2.0
Plato v2.0
11 months ago
Reply to  kat

Actually they’ve all already read it and know it’s limits. That is why they ignore it, and disrespect it. Your worries over the convention of states betray your own misunderstanding of the document you claim to want to defend. The constitution has been read time after time, reading it does no good! It’s high time to START FOLLOWING THE WORDS… Read more »