‘Unbiased’ Reuters is hawking communista AOC’s merchandise

2
126

Reuters, an international news service that does not like the USA, bills itself as remaining true to its “trust principles.”

“With unmatched coverage in over 16 languages, and reaching billions of people worldwide every day, we provide trusted intelligence that powers humans and machines to make smart decisions. Founded in 1851, Reuters has remained true to the Trust Principles of independence, integrity, and freedom from bias, working relentlessly to bring news from the source and from every corner of the world,” they proclaim in the ‘about us‘ section.

Reuters — this so-called unbiased, trustworthy agency — and we say that with no small amount of sarcasm — is hawking communista Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s online merchandise. How ironic that the little communista wants totalitarianism for all of us but capitalism for herself.

Something is amiss at Reuters.

THIS IS WHAT CORRUPTION IN MEDIA LOOKS LIKE

THEIR CORRUPT EXCUSE IS THAT SHE HAS STAR POWER


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ruck Feuters Enemedia Scum
Ruck Feuters Enemedia Scum
9 months ago

Capitalist pig exploitation! Are these items made from green friendly materials?
Redistribution of all profits to the comrades of her collective is essential to maintain the unity.
Attention comrades of esteemed party member AOC’s district (called Our District with its own www page), demand reparations for this capitalist pig exploitation!
Forward! Yes we can, si se peude!

Steiner Laughs Maniacally
Steiner Laughs Maniacally
9 months ago

“Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.”

Princeton, Testing Theories of American Politics, 2014.