What Nuclear War Would Look Like

10
2340

In the first clip, Glenn Greenwald and Tucker discussed the possibility of nuclear war since it is being discussed in Washington and the Kremlin. But to truly understand what nuclear war would really mean, a simulation works best. Watch the four-minute simulation out of Princeton University called Plan A.

“The consensus in Washington is that we are closer to the use of nuclear weapons than at any time since the Cuban Missile Crisis … And over what? Over who governs and rules not even Ukraine, but the Donbas,” Greenwald said.

He tweeted earlier yesterday, “Whatever your views on what former CIA Director Leon Panetta calls the “US proxy war” against Russia over Ukraine, it’s stunning how little discussion and debate there is — including, or rather especially, in the US Congress — given the grave risks and dangers at play here.”

Watch:

There are various nuclear war simulations online. One currently under development at Stream allows you to create your own nuclear war scenarios. It’s a game but the end result will be technical accuracy.

Researchers at Princeton University’s Program on Science & Global Security (SGS), has seen renewed interest since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent threats of nuclear war by Russia and Nato.

The simulation below shows how a nuclear war between Russia and NATO could potentially play with the deaths of millions throughout the world.

The researchers at Princeton developed a four-minute audiovisual piece called “Plan A”.

The Plan A simulation was originally prepared for an exhibition at Princeton’s Bernstein Gallery in 2017. It was later made available to the public as a YouTube video in 2019. Its aim is to highlight the “potentially catastrophic” consequences of a nuclear war between Russia and NATO.

Plan A shows how a localized nuclear exchange could quickly escalate into a global catastrophe. The scenario shown in the piece is a plausible one based on the available evidence.

The video starts with limited nuclear warning shots and ends with 91.5 million dead.

 

The countervalue Plan
Countervalue

Watch the video:

You can see more simulations by Dr. Ivan Stepanov, who is the developer of a nuclear war simulator, on this link.

ABOUT THE INSANE DEMOCRAT TALKING POINTS

To digress and go back in time, the Democrat allegations that Putin had control of Donald Trump was beyond absurd. Now that we have a real threat, it’s ignored. Go figure.


PowerInbox
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Deimos
Deimos
3 months ago

It’s in the warplans of Russia, China, North Korea and Iran that if they launch a missle off the east coast about in the center, over DC with a 10 kt nuke and detonate it at about 70 miles up, we wouldn’t see or hear it and have no reaction time. It would create an EMP that would destroy all computers and electronics. So no phones, internet, electricity, no vehicles built after 1975, no food, no water, and we will essentially be back in the 1850’s. Estimates are about 90% of the population would be dead in a year. That’s what I expect to happen.

GuvGeek
GuvGeek
3 months ago
Reply to  Deimos

While an EMP is a problem. If you’re disconnected from the Grid, have good grounding, Faraday Cages, and Surge Suppression (TVS devices), you can pretty much eliminate EMP related failures. Something as simple as a buried Metal Garbage Can will make an excellent Faraday Cage. It’s the length of wires above ground that makes an EMP attack practical. The longer a wire or piece of metal the more energy it will absorb. When buried, the pulse can be absorbed by the surrounding earth. The energy from an EMP dissipates rapidly with distance. The higher the detonation the lower the energy density. Grounding and Bonding is critical to Equipment surviving an EMP.

William Wallace
William Wallace
4 months ago

Im starting to believe the (so called) leadership of the US is Satanic and dont care how many casualties occur..Probably see it as a Blood Sacrifice to usher in a great reset.

The Prisoner
The Prisoner
4 months ago

Some nuclear explosions on a battlefield is the likely initial action. This could happen if the psychopaths running the USA enable a massive attack on Russian troops or territories. Such attacks are greatly deterred, because both sides are able to hit with many tactical weapons. That could escalate to remote military targets hit. None of that destroys the Earth or humanity.

The best plan for Americans to stop this is to get rid of democrats and RINOs. But that will take at least 2 more years. DS has half of us in stupors and does not care what the rest of us think.

steve
steve
4 months ago
Reply to  The Prisoner

I don’t think we have 2 years

Bev
Bev
4 months ago

We’ll never know until it actually happens if we miraculously survive the blast.

No simulation necessary. Perhaps all we need is a blank sheet of paper.

GuvGeek
GuvGeek
4 months ago

The reality is if you live in an American City of more than 500,000 you are toast in a Nuclear War. If you live over 50 miles from a major city (or primary target) and are prepared, you have a chance. The interesting reality is that in a “limited” Nuclear War over 250,000,000 Americans would be dead in a year and virtually all of them will be Liberal Democrats. Not only are Democrat Leaders insane, but so are the Democrats who keep voting for them!

The biggest reason America will be Annihilated in a Nuclear War is that the Liberal Thinking is that there will never be Global Thermonuclear War. That’s just wishful thinking. President Trump focused on refurbishment of Americas Nuclear capabilities because he was a realist and understood that it will be the little guy who will start a Bar Fight. Ukraine is the Little Guy! Many Russian Cities are designed to protect a substantial portion of their population from a first strike. American City planners have never considered the idea. Russia overall has a much more dispersed population, while most of America’s population is concentrated along the East and West Coast.

Consider America from the view point of Russia. America has a large nuclear capability, but don’t plan for the survival of a Nuclear Attack. Strategically, that makes us a First Strike Nation since our survival is dependent on taking out an adversaries strike capability first. Add to that our debt and potential for economic collapse and you can understand why we make Russia and pretty much the rest of the World nervous.

tada
tada
4 months ago
Reply to  GuvGeek

over 250,000,000 Americans would be dead in a year and virtually all of them will be Liberal Democrats.”

Most of them will be dead within the next 5 years anyway from the kill shot and all the boosters. Maybe thats why they don’t care if there’s a nuke war.

GuvGeek
GuvGeek
3 months ago
Reply to  tada

Good Point!