If you go into a virus testing center, don’t leave, ‘positive’ is a default

7
1679

People are reporting that just going into a coronavirus testing center in some jurisdictions could get you a positive test result, even if you never took the test. ‘Positive’ appears to be the default.

NEW GUIDELINES TO GET THE NUMBERS STRAIGHT

The Trump administration announced new guidelines recently. Hospitals were ordered to bypass the CDC. They now send all COVID-19 patient information to a central database in Washington DC. HHS is in charge.

Common Core Test Results Gathering?

Newsmax correspondent Emerald Robinson writes on Twitter, “My DM’s are flooded with people in various states (LA, TX, GA, TN, FL) telling me the same story: they signed up for the test & went to the testing site but left early because of long lines. Despite not taking the test, they get notified later that they’ve tested positive.”

Ms. Robinson also wrote that the administration confirmed that CDC has been misreporting data to inflate coronavirus numbers. If true, why would they do that?

There are reports that Dr. Birx — behind closed doors — said she doesn’t trust any numbers coming out of the CDC. she thinks the numbers are inflated by 23%.

How can we plan without accurate numbers?

IN THE BEGINNING

Health officials from numerous states have ‘mistakenly’ included positive results from antibody tests when reporting new Coronavirus cases to the CDC, ultimately inflating new cases.

Fox News contributor and physician Nicole Saphier reported: “Health officials from numerous states have mistakenly included positive results from antibody tests when reporting new COVID-19 cases to the CDC, grossly inflating new cases. The scientific equivalent to ‘double-dipping.'”

Her tweet was taken down:

Reporter Paul Sperry came up with a similar result:

FOX 35 Orlando investigated and found out that 300 labs were reporting 100% COVID positivity rates.


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Spokesman
Guest
The Spokesman
3 years ago

Also very important the answer below from National Research Council Canada to Christine Massey, M.Sc:

National Research Council Conseil national de recherches

Canada Canada

ATIP Office

1200 Montreal Road

Building M-55

Bureau de l’AIPRP

1200 chemin Montréal

Édifice M-55

Ottawa, Canada Ottawa, Canada

K1A 0R6 K1A 0R6

ATIP.AIPRP@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

July 14, 2020 Our file: A2020-0010

PROTECTED

Christine Massey, M.Sc.

#221 – 93 George St. S.

Brampton, ON

L6Y 1P4

Dear Christine Massey:

This letter is in response to the request you made to the National Research Council

(NRC) under the Access to Information Act for records pertaining to:

“All records in the possession, custody or control of the National Research

Council of Canada (NRC) describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus,

directly from a sample taken from a diseased patient, where the patient

sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material

(i.e. monkey kidney cells aka vero cells; liver cancer cells).

Please note that I am using “isolation” in the every-day sense of the word:

the act of separating a thing(s) from everything else. I am not requesting

records where “isolation of SARS-COV-2” refers instead to:

• the culturing of something, or

• the performance of an amplification test (i.e. a PCR test), or

• the sequencing of something.

Please also note that my request is not limited to records that were

authored by the NRC or that pertain to work done by the NRC. My request

includes any sort of record, for example (but not limited to) any published

peer-reviewed study that the NRC has downloaded or printed.

If any records match the above description of requested records and are

currently available to the public elsewhere, please provide enough

information about each record so that I may identify and access each

record with certainty (i.e. title, author(s), date, journal, where the public

may access it).”

Your request was received by the NRC on June 13, 2020, and your application fee was

received and processed on June 19, 2020.

A thorough search of NRC’s records has now been completed, and we regret to inform

you that no records responsive to your request were identified.

2/Massey

Please note that in the processing of your request, NRC’s Access to Information and

Privacy (ATIP) Office confirmed that it was not possible to generate a list of publications

as specified within the above-cited text. Specific details regarding access to publications

by NRC researchers have not been centrally documented by NRC’s Human Health

Therapeutics Research Centre, nor by the Library team responsible for NRC’s electronic

collections and journal subscriptions.

If you are not satisfied with this response, you are entitled to file a complaint with the

Information Commissioner of Canada within 60 days (

https://www.oic-

ci.gc.ca/en/submitting-complaint) after the day on which you will have received this

letter.

Yours sincerely,

2020-07-14

X

Maria Krioutchkova

Signed by: Krioutchkova, Maria

Maria Krioutchkova

ATIP Coordinator

The Spokesman
Guest
The Spokesman
3 years ago

Aerosolized TB or Covid 19?
There a well explained video of Dr. Andrew Kaufman on how the test brings false positives and more with the Covid-19 RT-PCR Test

https://www.bitchute.com/video/U2xM8ZJ0Xmdx/

Sharon Richards
Guest
Sharon Richards
3 years ago
Reply to  The Spokesman

Agree. Dr. Kaufman gives an excellent explanation of the flaws of testing and a lot of good scientific data and info what is happening. He’s another doctor who’s had the courage to stand up and speak truthfully at great personal risk and sacrifice. Also check out the website “questioningcovid.com” where there are many other great interviews and articles including one that explains in great detail why the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test is flawed and was never intended to be used for diagnosis — this per the inventor. So we have flawed testing, flawed reporting of the flawed testing, and a virus that was never that deadly in the first place. Oh . . . we’re finally starting to get some statistics on the real death toll here — that of all who have died as a consequence of this quarantine and lock down ridiculousness, which will be WAY more times than the dang virus itself. It’s unbelievable beyond words.

herbert r richmond
Member
herbert r richmond
3 years ago

This s a political scam designed to change the upcoming election, to transform America into a completely Socialist country.

NHConstitutionalist
Guest
NHConstitutionalist
3 years ago

I’ve had it with the half baked mandates and opinions given out by half assed so called experts that won’t admit they don’t know what they don’t know about the Chinese Bat Crap flu. It’s that damn mask which I do wear in public places that’s stifling especially in the heat. I live in the country, nothing beats fresh air and sunshine which is natures disinfectant.. But if the indoctrinated Chi-com liberals want to live live in their basement cave with their neurosis have at it. This attempt at subjugation by these intrusive parasites on humanity will only stop when we fight back and refuse to take the dictatorial crap from these clap trap crack pots. The margin of error and erroneous reporting makes them 50%useless. Even though they say the testing is free it’s another lie, the taxpayers once again are picking up the tab for test kits, personnel plus lab testing. And for what to give people a false sense that they’re doing something, other than racking up false positives to give Big Phama more of our money who is already tucking it to us?

Tim Kuehl
Guest
Tim Kuehl
3 years ago

This is exactly why I don’t believe any of the numbers, CDC, WHO, FDA, Fauci, etc. They have all been caught lying to us from the beginning of this so why would any thinking person believe them now? It is all about the election with people’s acceptance of unconstitutional edicts and money for big pharma as icing on the cake for the establishment.
And with acceptance to suspension of our Constitutional rights for safety in a crisis, when’s the next crisis going to happen when our rights are suspended again? And after that, when’s the next and the next and the next until we accept we have no rights at all?