WHO pushed social distancing while their report says there’s no evidence for it


A WHO skeptic believes the organization deliberately misled the world on social distancing. Prior to this, they have been accused of hiding the severity of the Wuhan Virus to please the Chinese Communist Party.

Ned Nikolov, PhD., works as a physical scientist for the U.S. Forest Service and has questioned the current theory of climate change. He is now questioning the lockdown and posted several tweets expressing his concerns about the current lockdown and the recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO) to nations encouraging social distancing.


Dr. Nikolov says it is WHO that pushed countries to go for the Draconian lockdown and it was agenda-driven.

He tweeted, “One has to be academically a total moron to not know/understand the skill of models in one’s area of research. The huge errors of COVID19 models (especially the IHME model) suggest a deliberate negligence IMO.”

The Ph.D. goes further and believes it was done deliberately to get countries to ante up for vaccines. He presented no evidence.

He continued, “My suspicion is that model projections were deliberately inflated to unreasonable levels to create social panic and get the politicians to lock downstate economies & commit $Billions to new vaccines etc. I don’t think that scientists were honest in these ridiculous projections.”

Since the models were so awful, he can’t believe it wasn’t deliberate.

In conclusion, he wrote, “Yes, a key reason for the lockdown was to prevent the overwhelming of hospitals with COVID19 patients. However, this was based on faulty model projections, not real trends. Question is, what did scientists know about the total lack of skill by their models? I think they knew it!”

We don’t necessarily agree with Dr. Nikolov since the social distancing did keep hospital admissions down, but his views are worth looking into. It’s important to keep in mind that a lot of this is his opinion, although he does include a WHO report which states there is little evidence social distancing works.

He claims that WHO knew of the ineffectiveness of social distancing as they pushed for it.

The 2019 report he refers to in these tweets can be viewed on this link. Go to page 37 and you will see that the report indicates there is a very low overall quality of evidence for contact tracing, keeping children from school, shutting down workplaces, avoiding crowding, or quarantining exposed individuals.

They recommend quarantining the sick.

So, why did the Marxist WHO director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus recommend it? He continues to recommend it.

Nikolov retweeted the following and there is a great deal of evidence that this is accurate:


Dr. Fauci said he warned Trump in January that the US was in real trouble but then stated publicly that the United States did not have to worry. The Wuhan Virus was not a major threat.

He and Dr. Birx followed the awful IHME models and the WHO guidance, which was tainted by China’s influence.

He claimed more than two million would have died had the nation not implemented social distancing, but there is no evidence that would have happened.

The doctors at the CDC were wrong about the first cases appearing at the end of February.

All of his predictions have been off. On February 29th, he told people it was okay to go to the movies, malls, and so on.

On March 9th, he told the young and healthy to go on cruises.

Now he wants a highly restrictive quarantine. As the stringent social distancing destroys the U.S. economy, he’s talking about doing this, endless testing, contract tracing for an expansive period of time. All of his predictions have been wrong. He’s an academic and he might have ivory tower syndrome.

The good doctors don’t like treatments, just vaccines. They ignored the value of treatments like hydroxychloroquine.

Perhaps it’s time we dumped WHO, Drs Fauci, Redfield, and Birx, and saved our economy with a careful re-opening. Less Fauci and more economic task force.



  1. The effect is staggering. The local Children’s Mercy has furloughed 575 employees for up to two months, or more. They are losing a net 1 Million / day. This is only ONE hospital in the area and the state. Others are laying off in the hundreds. All these hospitals took care of many necessary procedures but patients willingly, or unwillingly by state decree, may suffer the consequences as a result. There will be no death statistics associated with those closures. Rather it will be overlooked for the most part.

  2. What if the CDC is just a vaccine patent owning entity?
    What if the Pirbright Institute (UK) owns the Covid vaccine patent?
    What if China released the virus due to Trump’s sanctions?

  3. Dr Judy Mikovics, virologist, 20 years at CDC until Tony Fauci threatened her with arrest if she came back into the building.

    23:20 Viruses can’t live in the air. Must have water. Live only in cells. Live no more than an hour on surfaces.

    36:25 Fauci corruption. 41:15 Fauci would have her arrested if she came back on the premises.

    1:32.50 Viruses can’t live to travel six feet in the air. Hence social distancing is nonsense. Masks only good for reinfecting you if you’re already sick.

    Take out the blank spaces to get the URL:

    https:// www. youtube.com/watch?v=GJb-g8ZB4xo&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0lGcrq7OMKLzNU_Z767tBxmnW4Y-zEbtPvqdnLC_BocUU0QTBfzlbBKdE

  4. I like how you write that he says the models were deliberately bad to get other countries to commit billions to a vaccine, but he presents no evidence. Then write that you don’t agree with his stance on social distancing because the social distancing did keep hospital admissions down but present no evidence. Why not hold your own article to the standards you’re asking of him? Is this because you’re stating something that’s impossible to prove weather it’s true or false as if it’s a fact?

    • Well said. I was about to comment on that very statement and the lack of evidence for it. One could just as easily claim that social distancing kept us from being overrun by tigers, like the kid using a noisemaker to keep the tigers away. When told there were no tigers around here, he said “see how well it works?” When someone claims that “we flattened the curve”, we have to ask “compared to what?” Compared to the models that we know were horribly bad (whether due to astounding incompetence or deliberate fraudulence)? To say that since the hospitals were not overwhelmed, anything we did prior to the hospitals not being overwhelmed must be responsible is to commit a major “post hoc” fallacy.
      One study done in Israel concluded that there was no difference in the actual curve for the disease in any country, regardless of what lock down policies they followed or if there was no lock down at all. The shape of the curve for Italy was no different than the shape of the curve for Sweden, for example. Some calculations done for the U.S. showed no difference in case fatalities between states that did not lock down and those that did, after adjusting for population and other factors. So far the evidence seems to be saying that nothing anyone did managed to flatten the curve at all.
      However, if we DID flatten the curve, it would probably make things worse to the extent it was flattened. “Flattening the curve” was never about reducing the total number of cases but simply about spreading the cases out over a longer period of time to reduce the load on hospitals. That can only delay the achievement of herd immunity, likely ensuring more total cases in the long run.

    • Can’t the DOJ take care of this guy? There has to be numerous things he can be charged with. India charged him with crimes for the damage he did to young people with illegal forced vaccinations.

  5. Yes, exactly, this is also my conclusion over several weeks now, for various reasons including my own analysis of the data. See my blog item in summary:
    “Twenty Science-Based Articles and Reports Crushing All Arguments for Continued Lockdowns, Masking, Anti-Social Distancing and Ruination of National Economies”
    James DeMeo, PhD

  6. Is the USA too corrupt, too weak, too cowardly, too stupid, to prevent itself from being destroyed? It’s not clear.

  7. Once again, its all about money. … COVID-19 escaped from the lab prematurely (sloppy handling) before a madiated worldwide vacine could be developed and patented by Big Pharna. The Gate’s Foundation, the Clinton Foundation, et al, know all about it.

  8. Careful reopening? There’s nothing to be careful about. The whole affair is a massive hoax to test the stupidity of the population, just like Orson Well’s War of the Worlds and the USA passed with flying colors, the stupidest people in history. STOP THE CORONA-SCAM, GET OUT OF YOUR HOUSE, HUG YOUR NEIGHBORS AND GET BACK TO WORK.

Leave a Reply