Obama Labor Dept. Sets Stage for Nationalizing Retirement Accounts

20
837

via Director Blue

barack-obama-thomas-perez
Barack Obama and Tom Perez

IF YOU LIKE YOUR 401(k), YOU CAN KEEP YOUR 401(k): Obama Labor Dept. Sets Stage for Nationalizing Retirement Accounts

by David Mills

In 2013, in a little-heralded case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected the Obama Labor Department’s attempt to punish voluntary retirement plan service providers. The DOL, under the direction of the controversial, radical leftist Tom Perez, had tried to force providers of 401(k), 403(b), IRA, and related services to adopt a massive new set of regulations known as “fidiculary” responsibilities.

The Seventh Circuit slammed the door shut on Labor and the Supreme Court thereafter declined to hear the appeal, which meant that the Obama administration had lost in the highest court in the land.

Of course for the “most transparent administration ever”, that step simply meant that the court’s opinion was to be rejected and that Obama would use his infamous pen to rule by executive fiat. After all, the ends justify the means, correct?

On August 24th, Perez and the Labor Department confirmed they are moving forward with new regulations that would repudiate the court’s opinion. Even Obama’s SEC Commissioner issued an ominous warning that the Labor Department’s new regulations would unleash havoc and create “a mess.”

Furthermore, financial services experts have cautioned that the new rule is “too complicated to [actually] put into practice.”

Earlier this month, the Labor Department held public hearings to discuss the input and concerns they have received from industry groups and other stakeholders that will be impacted by the department’s proposal to expand the definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA … In the debate over the DOL’s proposal — which, as written, [will] create a vast and costly new regulatory regime for independent firms and advisers across the country

Barack Obama and Tom Perez don’t care about all of that. They’re on a mission to seize your retirement funds:

Labor Department officials are determined to produce a new standard of fiduciary duty for anyone giving retirement investment advice, once they process concerns raised in thousands of comment letters and four days of hearings on their proposal.

 

A SIMPLE PLAN

Like Obamacare, the idea is to drive small- and mid-size service providers out of the retirement business by ensuring that the costs of complying with regulations are unaffordable. And, to ensure a Republican president can’t easily unwind the Rube Goldberg machinery, the Labor Department has also promised an impossible eight month implementation timeline. Most providers believe it will take three years to follow all of the byzantine rules and regulations.

Their intent, in my view, is to force a consolidation of the retirement service industry, just as Obamacare drove mergers and acquisitions in the health care business, leaving only gigantic corporations in its wake. These companies have become intertwined and dependent upon legislators and lobbyists in Washington. They can’t make a move without the permission of the federal leviathan.

Many Democrats are open about the true goal of Obamacare: to end up with a single-payer health care system, modeled after the National Health Service in the U.K. You know, the system that was reported to have killed 120,000 seniors in 2012 alone.

 

SETTING THEIR SIGHTS ON TRILLIONS OF YOUR RETIREMENT DOLLARS

The Obama administration has its sights set on an incredible amount of your money. By some estimates, Americans are holding well over $10 trillion in private retirement accounts.

For a country with debt that is clearly “unsustainable” (source: the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office), that amount of money is akin to showing a kilo of heroin to a desperate junkie.

 

THE GOAL: FINANCIAL REPRESSION

One of the first steps the Obama administration took to signal its direction was to unveil its wildly unsuccessful “MyRA” program. This takes participants’ funds and invests them in “ultra-safe”, government-issued debt.

You can be sure that the future of the retirement services business will be to extend “fiduciary” responsibilities to require advisors to leverage federal debt instruments in their clients’ portfolios.

This is called “financial repression“, and it is the hallmark of a government on its way to bankruptcy. Essentially, a failing government forces investors to purchase its debt because it knows damn well that the instruments will ultimately never be repaid.

Argentina and other failed countries have embarked upon this strategy prior to a full-blown currency collapse.

You can be sure that the real goal of the Obama administration is to nationalize your retirement account and to invest it in debt that will become increasingly unsellable in the open market.

If you want to maintain control of your retirement funds, I’d recommend contacting your member of Congress today. Urge them to defund the Department of Labor until this rule is nuked from orbit.

 

Related, must-read: Don’t cry for me, America.

 


PowerInbox
0 0 votes
Article Rating
20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
napalm
6 years ago

I don’t feel the least bit worried when I say when this Marxist leaves office there is no security on the planet the can protect this dead man walking! Mind you this is my opinion but with 800 give or take ex special forces pissed off at you and millions of very quiet ones well.

BERTHA CRISS
BERTHA CRISS
6 years ago

IM SORRY BUT ITS THE JOB OF THE PRESIDENT TO UPHOLD THE LAWS IN THE USA ,NOT TO CHANGE THEM TO HIS SATISFACTION.,WITH HIS PEN AND PHONE LOL.HE NEEDS TO BE IMPEACHED FOR LYING TO SO MANY IF HE GETS HIS WAY ON THIS HE WILL GO AFTER THE SOCIAL SECURITY THAT SO MANY ELDERLY DEPEND ON.IMPEACH HIM NOW PPL.

Jack Stanley
Jack Stanley
6 years ago

Just what you would expect from a tree hugging communist—socialist—liberal—progressive—democrat—who wants to control you and turn you into an ant.

Tontine
Tontine
6 years ago

Nothing is sacrosanct to leftwing moonbats, they’re steal the pennies off a dead mans eyes,

Jose A. Azpurua
Jose A. Azpurua
6 years ago

Obama´s behavior, in this case, is exactly the same as Hugo Chávez´s behavior in Venezuela, where he began to legislate via executive orders, in a sense, contrary to the stated people´s desires stated in a referendum.
Obama is attempting to bury, via unconstitutional executive orders the little remaining freedom of the american people.