Bush Is Bad; His Tax Cuts Good

November 19, 2012
By

I’m sure you’ve heard about it.  The “fiscal cliff” is what we call it.  A metaphor created by Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, to describe the financial pain and discomfort associated with the death of the so-called Bush Tax Cuts.  The deadline for Congress to act to prevent going over that cliff is December 31st.

So, what exactly can YOU expect to pay in increased taxes if Congress fails?

The folks at Yahoo News had this estimate:

“The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center says that if all the scheduled tax increases occur, the average household would have to fork over an extra $3,400 to Uncle Sam next year.  Here’s the average hike taxpayers would face, broken down by income group:

–Lowest fifth of households (average income: $11,239): $412

–Second-lowest fifth (average income: $29,204): $1,231

–Middle fifth (average income: $49,842): $1,984

–Second-highest fifth (average income: $80,080): $3,540

–Highest fifth (average income: $178,020): $14,173

–Top 1 percent (average income: about $1.3 million): $120,537

The biggest hit for most people would come from the expiration of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, which would raise income-tax rates for everybody by 3 to 5 percentage points, depending on the tax bracket. Those changes alone would raise the tax rate for a family earning $80,000 from 25 percent to 28 percent, resulting in about $1,450 worth of new taxes.”

President Obama says he’s ready to compromise…except on taxes assessed the highest income earning Americans.  I’m sure he’d love to lower the taxes on the majority of voters, but he’s dead set on doing so at the expense of the wealthy.  From the above table, it would seem that he might be doing so at the expense of everyone.

Tags: , ,




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What is 13 + 12 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

Quote of the Week

“Tornadoes form below a class of severe thunderstorms known as supercells. Supercells feature intense upward moving columns of air that rotate, as the wind near the surface is drawn into those columns it begins to rotate and forms the tornado vortex. The damage attributed to tornadoes is caused by the strong winds in the vortex and flying debris.

“Oklahoma sits within an area of the United States commonly referred to as ‘tornado alley’ – this area is amongst the most frequent locations of tornado occurrence in the world. At this time of year, the warm and moist air from the Gulf of Mexico and cool and dry air from above the Rocky Mountains come together to make tornado alley the perfect environment to spawn supercells and tornadoes.

“Preliminary reports of damage from the Oklahoma tornado suggest it was of EF-4 intensity, which is the second highest intensity rating. EF-4 tornadoes have wind gusts between about 265 and 320 kilometres per hour.”

Dr. Todd Lane, ARC Future Fellow, School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne

Fabulous 50 Winner!

Winner - 2012 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Alexa

Google