CNN: “why can’t we take out these bastards?”


Jim Acosta, CNN reporter

We have given more money to Syrian aid than any other country in the world but Obama promised today that we will send more. He will not change our strategy and he will continue on his failed path. Reporter Jim Acosta of CNN asked him today “why can’t we take out these bastards?” Obama got nasty and continued with his usual non-answer that his strategy is the right one.

Obama sneering

OBAMA: “Jim Acosta.”

ACOSTA: “Thank you very much, Mr. President. I wanted to go back to something you said to Margaret earlier when you said you have not underestimated ISIS’s abilities. This is an organization that you once described as a JV team, that evolved into a force that is now occupied territory in Iraq and Syria and is now able to use that safe haven to launch attacks in other parts of the world.

How is that not underestimating their capabilities? And how is that contained, quite frankly?

And I think a lot of Americans have this frustration that they see that the United States has the greatest military in the world, it has the backing of nearly every other country in the world when it comes to taking on ISIS. I guess the question is, and if you’ll forgive the language, is why can’t we take out these bastards –“

OBAMA: “Well, Jim, I just spent the last three questions answering that very question, so I don’t know what more you want me to add. I think I’ve described very specifically what our strategy is. And I’ve described very specifically why we do not pursue some of the other strategies that have been suggested –[crosstalk] — this is not, as I said, a traditional military opponent.

We can retake territory. And as long as we leave our troops there, we can hold it, but that does not solve the underlying problem of eliminating the dynamics that are producing these kinds of violent extremist groups.

And so we are going to continue to pursue the strategy that has the best chance of working even though it does not offer the satisfaction, I guess, of a neat headline or an immediate resolution.

And part of the reason, as I said, Jim, is because there are costs to the other side. I just want to remind people. This is not an abstraction. When we send troops in, those troops get injured, they get killed, they’re away from their families.

Our country spends hundreds of billions of dollars. And so given the fact that there are enormous sacrifices involved in any military action, it’s best that we don’t, you know, shoot first and aim later. It’s important for us to get the strategy right and the strategy we are pursuing is the right one.”


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
7 years ago

Cockroaches are hard to kill!

7 years ago

Those ISIS guys must be pretty tough…. and smart too…
They have the the Iraqi’s, the Syrians, the Jordanian’s, the Israelis’, the Egyptian’s, the Saudi’s, the Russian’s the American’s and now the French bombing the living hell out them.
And they just keep on keepin’ on……
That’s more combined intelligence and fire power than against the Germans in WWII.
Something just doesn’t add up now…does it.

Christopher J. Pauli
Christopher J. Pauli
7 years ago
Reply to  Steedee

What happened to the Imon Mohamud Barack, Barry Soeto Obama attack
on Jim Acosta? Somebody sucked up to SOMEBODY and kisseda little ass!