Expert Predicts Obama’s Pick for SCOTUS and It’s Not Good

2
Share

US Attorney General Lynch attends a news conference in Zurich

Tom Goldstein of the highly respected SCOTUSblog, which covers all things Supreme Court, predicts Obama wants a black nominee for the court and writes, “The fact that Lynch was vetted so recently for attorney general also makes it practical for the president to nominate her in relatively short order.”

Lynch would be hotly-contested pick in the U.S. Senate. She shouldn’t have been given the job she has after what she said during her confirmation hearings.

She made it clear that she was not going to follow the Constitution and act independently but rather she testified that she was going to serve at the will of the president. She doesn’t serve the American people.

Partial-birth abortion is illegal but she signed onto a Planned Parenthood brief to make it legal. Then she tried to sidestep the issue when confronted during her confirmation hearing. She said she focused ‘on the issue of the facial aspect of the law and how it might impact law enforcement’s discretion and independence’. That’s meaningless gibberish meant to deflect and it’s dishonest.

In case you don’t know what partial-birth abortion is, you need to look it up. If we do that to the unborn, we might as well go back to the days of drawing and quartering people. There is no difference.

Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana sent her a letter asking if she’d investigate Hillary’s email scandal and she would not commit. As Sen. Vitter said, there is reason to believe she won’t uphold the law.

She supports Obama’s lawless immigration rules and opposes the Second Amendment as written.

She is a reliable leftist minion to Barack Obama.

Lynch is the one who recently told Muslim parents whose children were bullied to call the Department of Justice to report these children. She also said she would prosecute hate speech against Muslims.

Mentioning the Civil Rights Division, she said they [the DOJ] look at “anti-Muslim rhetoric and actions turning to violence” and “we do take action.”

She said the San Bernardino terror attack was a “wonderful opportunity” and the opportunity she was talking about was to limit the gun rights of innocent, law-abiding Americans.

“Because we’re at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change,” the attorney general said.

She’s also a liar. Last November, during a House hearing, Loretta Lynch was asked about sanctuary cities. She pretended she was unfamiliar with the sanctuary law and said she didn’t know if the DOJ was outlawing sanctuary cities.

If she were to be appointed, she would tilt the Supreme Court of the United States so far to the left that the Constitution itself would literally be rewritten. It would end up looking like the South African constitution that Justice Ginsberg likes so much or perhaps it will look like the UN [Socialist] Declaration of Human Rights.

Share

2 COMMENTS

  1. The Senate Republicans that voted to confirm her into the DOJ slot will have a chance to correct their vote after what’s she done in her short time on the job.

  2. Civil liberty is maintained through an objective judicial system that is respected by a majority of citizens. The entire internal security of a people depends on just and skillful administration of law, which protects the innocent and punishes the guility.

Comments are closed.