Hillary’s Back, Trying to Sway Electors

2

The recount in Wisconsin didn’t work. Trump picked up 162 votes. The Pennsylvania recount was rejected by the judge. That dashes the recount plans but Democrats are now placing their hopes on the Hamilton Electors who are attempting to get electors to switch their votes. The Clinton campaign has jumped on this bandwagon as they did with the recounts.

Ten Electoral College members wrote a letter to the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and insisted they receive an intelligence briefing around any possible investigations into Russia before next Monday’s meeting. This group of nine Democrats and one Republican (a Texas never Trumper) wants Trump to personally prove that his campaign did not work with the Russians. From the letter:

“The Electors require to know from the intelligence community whether there are ongoing investigations into ties between Donald Trump, his campaign or associates, and Russian government interference in the election, the scope of those investigations, how far those investigations may have reached, and who was involved in those investigations.”

The group and the Democrats in general want to politicize the electoral college and make them susceptible to campaigning, threats, coercion.

Clinton and her top aide John Podesta are supporting the electors efforts.

On October 7th, two of Obama’s drones, John Brennan and Jeh Johnson, DNI and DHS respectively, said they thought Russia directed the hacking of the DNC and others to help Trump win, according to John Podesta.  He is now demanding the electors be given a briefing on the Russians hacking emails when there was no hacking of the electoral process.

There has been no evidence presented to the public that the Russians affected votes. If people were swayed by the DNC, Podesta and Soros emails, it was because they were accurate and had nothing to do with the Russians. The electorate simply had more information than they would have had.

In Washington and Colorado, some electors have taken their case to court because their state requires them to vote the way the public voted and they don’t want to. Of course, they are Democrats.

“We now know that the CIA has determined Russia’s interference in our elections was for the purpose of electing Donald Trump,” John Podesta said in a statement. “This should distress every American. Never before in the history of our Republic have we seen such an effort to undermine the bedrock of our democracy.”

There might be evidence the Russians tried to hack machines but did not succeed, that’s it.

The Russians didn’t make Hillary fail to campaign in Wisconsin and Michigan. Were they responsible for her server, her Benghazi performance, the corruption of her campaign, her lies, her crooked Foundation? Was it Russia who made Hillary okay the sale of 20% of our uranium mine to Russia and US technology as well? Was it Russia that made the Podestas go into business with Russia, facilitating the sale of US technology to them?

An investigation is fine but trying to damage Donald Trump with no evidence is something else. While we are at it, let’s investigate illegal aliens voting, especially in California and New York.

Democrats have gone to Plan B. Prior to this, the Clinton campaign attempted to see if they could play the Russia card and allege that the votes in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin were hacked. On January 27th, they said they were investigating “any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.”

Plan B from the outset was always to call the election a FRAUD and deny Trump the office or at least diminish his stature. With 99% of newspapers endorsing Hillary, the media are always on board to try to call the election a fraud.

The Clinton team came up with this in April.

Senator Cardin said today that we know Russia hacked us. Who’s ‘us’. John Podesta?

It won’t change the results but they are trying to delegitimize the election and destroy Trump. It’s going to be a long four years.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Oh please, give me a break. WikiLeaks claims (as do several other “in the know” people) that the source of the leaks were from within the DNC.

    What the liberal left refuses to acknowledge is that no one from the Clinton Camp has ever denied the validity of the e-mails. Their silence is pretty damning. If the mails were false I suspect they’d be whining four times as loud as they are about the actual leaks.

    The CIA even says they have no direct evidence; months ago the FBI claimed they investigated a possible Trump-Russia link and found none.

Comments are closed.