Obamacare Architect: Abortion’s a ‘Social Good’ That Gets Rid of ‘Marginal Children’


Breitbart has uncovered another scandalous Obamacare fact. The deceitful Architect of Obamacare, Jonathan Gruber, believes in aborting “marginal children.” In a paper titled, ABORTION LEGALIZATION AND CHILD LIVING, Gruber claims abortion is a “social good” in that it reduces the number of “marginal children.”

When he says that, he means the urban poor whom he believes will only commit crimes and collect welfare if they are allowed to be born.

The protest riots in Ferguson and New York City should be directed at leftists like Gruber who want to abort minority children in a wholesale act of genocide.

Gruber co-authored the paper in the 1990’s. In it he writes about the $14 billion in welfare benefit savings and the lowered crime rates that will result when the babies are not born in poor neighborhoods, because that’s what it is all about for the liberal.

It’s not about the people, though leftists appear to want to give endless welfare to everyone. It’s really about particularly eliminating “growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of,” as Justice Ginsberg said in a New York Times interview a few years back. She was describing the real purpose of Roe v. Wade at the time which was to control population growth.

Ginsberg has also said, “It makes no sense as a national policy to promote birth only among poor people.”

They’ve been very successful in their mission among blacks and Hispanics. On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States. In NYC, a liberal bastion, more black babies were killed in 2012 than were born, considerably more.

Hispanic children are being aborted at the rate of 31% of births. Black and Hispanic abortions together comprise 73% of the abortions in NYC, the abortion capital of the United States.

This is the arrogant liberal mindset – genocide to keep the population of poor down is good practice because they will only commit crimes and go on welfare. It’s good Dr. Carson’s mother didn’t agree with that sentiment.

In the paper, Gruber et al claim that “if women use abortion to avoid bearing children into adverse circumstances, positive selection would result:…the living circumstances of the marginal child are not as good as the average child, so that increased abortion access will raise average living standards of the children who are born.”

This is social engineering without any ethical discussion whatsoever. They’re not even honest enough to allow a discussion with all the cards on the table.

Desperate women go to Planned Parenthood clinics for help and in good faith and what they get is a eugenist who pushes them to abort their child.

It stands to reason that an Obamacare architect would also be a social engineer. Another Obamacare architect is Rahm Emanuel’s physician brother Zeke who incorporated the Complete Lives System into the healthcare system. It measures the worth of human beings according to their age and how productive they are. Betsy McCaughey explained the system in a WSJ article.

Cass Sunstein, Obama’s science advisor, wrote the paper “Lives, Life-Years, and Willingness to Pay” in the long-forgotten days of July 2003, when he was a mere 48-years-old.

In the paper, Sunstein criticized the government for protecting human life as though all lives were equal. Specifically, Sunstein said the government’s method for determining who received medical treatment should be changed; he suggested replacing the “value of a statistical life” (VSL) – which viewed all lives as equal – young people to receive medical care, if necessary while allowing older people to die, because they will live longer after the procedure is completed.

No list is complete without Kathleen Sebelieus, our modern day Queen of Death, who believes in abortion up until the moment of birth and without limitation. Back in March of 2012, she said that the reduction in births will compensate for the cost of the contraception mandate.

Obamacare allows for abortion and child sterilization without parental consent.

Notice a pattern among Democrats here? It is long overdue that the shroud of hypocrisy be lifted. All these evil acts are done in the name of the “common good.”

These are the same people who wouldn’t hurt a hair on the head of a wild chicken. They are the same people who will steal millions of acres from private land owners to give the dusky Gopher Frog open spaces to jump around in.

Who are they referring to when they say it is for the “common good”? It certainly isn’t minorities.

It won’t be anyone who doesn’t fit their amoral criteria for determining who lives an who dies. Sarah Palin was wrong. There isn’t a deathcare provision in Obamacare. Obamacare is deathcare.